Certificate of Attendance vs. Hazmat Certified


I Have a Hazmat Certificate – Does This Mean I’m Certified?

A certificate of completion, or a certificate of attendance, is not the same thing, nor is it equal to being nationally or state certified. Being certified means your proficiency has been assessed by DGI Training. It is official recognition that you possess certain qualifications and meet certain standards. So at the end of the day upon successful completion of our exams we issue a certificate which says you attended and demonstrated the proficiency necessary to obtain the certificate (a piece of paper).

As you know 49CFR is our American law. In 49CFR, Section 172.704(d) – Record keeping, it lays out five requirements;


(1) The hazmat employee's name;

(2) The most recent training completion date of the hazmat employee's training;

(3) A description, copy, or the location of the training materials used to meet the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section;

(4) The name and address of the person providing the training; and

(5) Certification that the hazmat employee has been trained and tested, as required by this subpart.

It’s mambo number five that hits home. How does the employer “certify” that the employee has been properly trained and tested? DGI provides the training and the proficiency testing, but it is up to the employer to “certify” that the employee has received the appropriate training & testing. After much research and conversations with the DOT there is no definition of “certifying.” I did find a couple of letters of interpretation (PHMSA #15-0071 & #14-0216) which say, that the employer must utilize the first four requirements above to “certify” the employee has been trained and tested. The employer’s signature on a DGI certificate verifies that these requirements have been met and certifies your hazmat proficiency.

These are our requirements here in America. With DGI’s online training we have to be sure the training, testing, recordkeeping requirements, and certification meet the requirements which may be different in your part of the world. Our Canadian friends to the north, for example, must have information on their certificates which isn’t required on our certificates. The Canadian Regulations called, Transport Dangerous Goods or TDG, Part 6.3 explains that the certificates must include;

(a) the name and address of the place of business of the employer; The place of business could be a local office, a regional office or a head office.

(b) the employee's name;

(c) the date the training certificate expires, preceded by the words “Expires on” or “Date d'expiration”; and

(d) the aspects of handling, offering for transport or transporting dangerous goods for which the employee is trained, including the specific topics set out in section 6.2.

So for our Canadian friends, please make sure the name and address of your company is printed on your certificate regardless of who provides it. Wherever you are, please make sure your training needs and requirements meet the standards of your government.

Sean Kelly
DGI Training

View Comments

HM-215N Rescinded - What it Means to You

United Nations Committee of Experts Recommendations Transport Dangerous Goods 19th Revised Edition / Amendment 38-16 International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code / 2017 – 2018 Edition International Civil Aviation Organization / 6th Revised Edition United Nations Manual of Test & Criteria / 6th Revised Edition of the Global Harmonization System / Canadian Transport Dangerous Goods / HM-215NWow! What a show! Ever wonder [...]

Read More »

The Safety Data Sheet and Transportation

First a little history. The administrative law for our federal government is The Code of Federal Regulations, commonly referred to as CFR. There are 50 titles. 49CFR governs hazardous materials or dangerous goods in transportation. 40CFR outlines requirements by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and 29CFR outlines the requirements by the Occupational Safety [...]

Read More »

Category 6

If you’re shipping dangerous goods by air, you’re probably familiar with Category 6. If you haven’t heard of it chances are you will. It’s not a hurricane.Back in the day when I was pushing pallets and locking down LD-3 containers we got our training OJT while loading the aircraft. Many times it [...]

Read More »

​ICAO Publishes Addendum 4

2015 – 2016 Edition, 23Feb16Although dated 23Feb16, addendum 4 was released on Friday, February 26, 2016. The addendum incorporates the prohibition of lithium ion batteries UN3480 as cargo on passenger airplanes into ICAO’s Technical Instructions 2015 – 2016 Edition.The ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel recommended in October, 2015, tougher restrictions on ion batteries but not a ban. ICAO’s Air Navigation Committee picked [...]

Read More »

Lithium Batteries Ban

The Death of Lithium Batteries in TransportationOn January 27, 2016, The ICAO Air Navigation Commission voted to ban lithium ion batteries as cargo on passenger airplanes. In October 2015, The ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel voted 11 – 7 for more restrictions on lithium batteries but not a complete ban as cargo on passenger airplanes. It appears the [...]

Read More »

​Environmentally Hazardous Substance / Marine Pollutant

Back in the day the international standard for classifying a marine pollutant was the one percent, 10 percent rule. There were / are two types of marine pollutants; A severe marine pollutant and a marine pollutant. So back in the day and in 49CFR today, if your product contains one percent of a severe marine pollutant, it must [...]

Read More »

​FAA Repair Stations FAR Part 145

Regulations, regulations, regulations, my gosh, will it ever stop? Enough with the bureaucracy already. But wait, we’re talking about people flying in airplanes. I’m okay with that. Make all the rules you want. Some of my favorites is limiting a cargo compartment on a passenger airplane to 25 kilos of dangerous goods, [...]

Read More »

Hazmat Penalties / Fines versus Training

The Department of Transportation calls them civil penalties. We call them fines. The end result is the same. They hurt.In 2013, hundreds of violations totaling more than 1.8 million dollars in fines were reported. Fines are supposed to work as deterrents. A stimulant to make us do the right thing. But if you [...]

Read More »

​Global Harmonization System – GHS And Transportation

What is the Global Harmonization System? From this point forward called GHS, where did it come from? And what does it have to do with transportation?I’m afraid I have to go deep here to provide a background and better understanding. Ever wonder why we have UN Spec Packaging? What does that symbol, the UN with a [...]

Read More »